08 / 08The audit layer. Optional unless a claim needs checking.
Supporting evidence
What is safe to say?
The detailed research remains available, but it no longer sits in the main reading path.
Verified8 claims ready to use carefully
- Synergy owns the building and is open to interested third parties.
- Western Power land was excluded from the 2021 transaction.
- A conditional agreement was executed in December 2021; use only as historical fact.
- The heritage identifier is place 3381.
- The project area is a multi-owner, multi-interest precinct.
- The site is classified remediated for restricted use.
- Medium/high-density residential can be compatible subject to restrictions.
- The 2014 plan already contemplated the obvious mixed-use ingredients.
Partial6 claims needing current or project-specific evidence
- Current ownership and easements are not yet fully mapped.
- Current contamination scope and cost are not known.
- Transport, rail, servicing and coastal constraints are known workstreams—not costed conclusions.
- Current planning yield and entitlement are not settled by historical plans.
- Fiveight is plausible by portfolio; appetite is not established.
- A government pathway exists, but the right route for this project is unconfirmed.
Unverified5 claims that remain hypotheses
- Current structural condition and conservation capex.
- A $100m Western Power relocation cost.
- A demonstrated premium-wellness market gap.
- Current Fiveight interest.
- Existing enforceable originator rights for Scarlet and Nicole.
Corrected1 claim that should not be repeated
The power-station site should not be described as classified “contaminated—remediation required.” The record made available in the research states “remediated for restricted use.” Adjacent landfill records must remain separate.
Primary source links
Snapshot boundary
Evidence reconciled to 28 August 2026. This is a research and origination brief—not legal, planning, environmental, engineering or investment advice.